Failure and complication rates of different materials, designs, and bonding techniques of ceramic cantilever resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses for restoring missing anterior teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to assess clinical trials that have examined the materials, design, and bonding of ceramic cantilevered resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses (RBFDPs) as a potential option for replacing missing anterior teeth. The evaluation primarily focuses on the rate of restoration failure and clinical complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A thorough search of databases including PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library, was conducted. The most recent search was performed in October 2023. Clinical studies that compared ceramic cantilevered RBFDPs with double retainers or cantilevered RBFDPs using different ceramic materials or bonding systems were included. The outcome measures considered were restoration failure and complication rates. RESULTS: Twelve studies met the eligibility criteria. The pooled data showed a statistically significant decrease in complication events when using cantilever designs compared with double retainer designs (p < 0.05); however, there were no differences found between the two designs in terms of restoration failure. The complication and failure rate of cantilever RBFDPs did not show a statistically significant difference with or without ceramic primer application before luting with phosphate monomer-containing luting resin (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Ceramic cantilevered RBFDPs have lower complication rates compared with those with double retainers. The use of a ceramic primer prior to luting composite resin for ceramic cantilevered RBFDPs decreases the occurrence of complications and failures, although this effect was not statistically significant. Additional research is required to confirm these findings. Glass ceramic cantilever RBFDPs showed a decrease in success after 6 years, requiring ongoing monitoring, but both zirconia and glass-infiltrated alumina cantilever RBFDPs have demonstrated durability with excellent long-term success and survival rates for up to 10 and 15 years. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Cantilever ceramic RBFDPs in the anterior region are a less invasive and valuable treatment option, providing good esthetic results.

Clinical benefits of immediate dentin sealing: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: The clinical complications, success, and survival rates of indirect restorations delivered with the immediate dentin sealing protocol are unclear. PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to find and collect evidence on the clinical complication, success, and survival rates of indirect restorations delivered with immediate dentin sealing. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for clinical studies on immediate dentin sealing up to December 2023, without language or time limitations. The records were included if they were clinical trials evaluating the clinical complication and survival rates of indirect restorations bonded to tooth substrate sealed immediately after preparation with suitable resin bonding. The extracted data were analyzed via Review Manager 5.4 for meta-analysis (α=.05). RESULTS: A total of 11 studies were included in this review. The clinical complication rate was lower for immediately sealed dentin than for protocols without dentin sealing. The survival rate of restorations luted with the immediate dentin sealing protocol was higher (96.4% to 100%) than that of immediate dentin sealing (81.8% to 96.7%), negatively correlated with the observation time. The intensity and incidence of postoperative sensitivity were statistically significantly lower for restorations with immediate dentin sealing than for those without dentin sealing or conventionally cemented (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Immediate dentin-sealed indirect restorations had fewer clinical complications and higher success and survival rates than those delivered without dentin sealing. To avoid postoperative sensitivity or reduce its intensity, dentin surfaces should be sealed immediately after preparation. More long-term randomized clinical trials are recommended to confirm these evidence-based conclusions.

Clinical survival and complication rate of ceramic veneers bonded to different substrates: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Evidence on the long-term clinical assessment and longevity of ceramic veneers bonded to different substrates is limited. PURPOSE: The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of various substrates, including enamel, dentin, or an existing composite resin restoration, on the clinical survival and complication rates of ceramic veneers. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The PubMed, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched, and related journals were hand searched without time or language restrictions to identify clinical trials that compared the survival rate and clinical complication rates when bonding ceramic veneers to different tooth substrates. The success rate of the included participants was estimated by the number of veneers that did not require a clinical intervention, and the survival rate by all veneers that did not fail absolutely. The risk difference (RD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for dichotomous outcomes was used to quantify the intervention effect. RESULTS: Of 973 screened articles, 6 clinical studies were included. The survival and success rates varied depending on the bonding substrate. Enamel-bonded veneers had almost perfect rates of survival (99% with a range of 98% to 100%) and success (99% with a range of 98% to 100%). Veneers bonded to composite resin or surfaces with minimal dentin exposure had slightly lower survival rates (94% with a range of 91% to 97% and 95% with a range of 91% to 100%, respectively) and success rates (70% with a range of 60% to 80% and 95% with a range of 90% to 99%). Severe dentin exposure significantly decreased both survival rates (91% with a range of 84% to 98%) and success rates (74% with a range of 64% to 85%). The combined findings suggested that ceramic veneers bonded to enamel had fewer clinical complications (RD: -0.04; 95% CI: -0.09 to 0.02) and lower failure rates (RD: -0.13; 95% CI: -0.32 to 0.07) compared with those bonded to exposed dentin. Additionally, veneers attached to teeth with minimal dentin exposure were significantly less likely to require clinical interventions (RD: -0.16; 95% CI: -0.31 to -0.01) and had a reduced incidence of failure (RD: -0.08; 95% CI: -0.17 to 0.01) compared with those with severe dentin exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Ceramic veneers bonded to enamel showed higher survival and success rates with lower clinical incidences of complications and failure than those bonded to dentin or teeth with existing composite resin restorations.

3D-printed intracoronal restorations, occlusal and laminate veneers: Clinical relevance, properties, and behavior compared to milled restorations; a systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the feasibility of producing 3D-printed intracoronal restorations, thin and ultrathin veneers, and to compare their mechanical behavior, accuracy, biological, and stain susceptibility to the currently applied milled restorations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The databases were comprehensively searched for relevant records up to January 2024 without language restrictions. All studies that assessed 3D-printed partial coverage restorations including inlays, onlays, laminate, and occlusal veneers were retrieved. RESULTS: The web search yielded a total of 1142 records, with 8 additional records added from websites at a later stage. Only 17 records were ultimately included in the review. The included records compared 3D-printed; alumina-based- and zirconia ceramics, lithium disilicate ceramics, polymer infiltrated ceramics, polyetheretherketone (PEEK), resin composites, and acrylic resins to their CNC milled analogs. The pooled data indicated that it is possible to produce ultrathin restorations with a thickness of less than 0.2 mm. 3D-printed laminate veneers and intracoronal restorations exhibited superior trueness, as well as better marginal and internal fit compared to milled restorations (p < 0.05). However, it should be noted that the choice of materials and preparation design may influence these outcomes. In terms of cost, the initial investment and production expenses associated with 3D printing were significantly lower than those of CNC milling technology. Additionally, 3D printing was also shown to be more time-efficient. CONCLUSIONS: Using additive manufacturing technology to produce restorations with a thickness ranging from 0.1 to 0.2 mm is indeed feasible. The high accuracy of these restorations, contributes to their ability to resist caries progression, surpassing the minimum clinical threshold load of failure by a significant margin and reliable adhesion. However, before 3D-printed resin restorations can be widely adopted for clinical applications, further improvements are needed, particularly in terms of reducing their susceptibility to stains. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: 3D-printed intracoronal restorations and veneers are more time and cost-efficient, more accurate, and could provide a considerable alternative to the currently applied CNC milling. Some limitations still accompany the resin materials, but this could be overcome by further development of the materials and printing technology.

The Influence of Ferrule Design and Pulpal Extensions on the Accuracy of Fit and the Fracture Resistance of Zirconia-Reinforced Lithium Silicate Endocrowns.

The study aimed to assess the marginal, axial, and internal adaptation, as well as the fracture resistance of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate (ZLS) endocrowns with varying pulpal inlay extensions and marginal geometry. Sixty extracted maxillary first molar teeth were divided into six groups (n = 10) according to pulpal inlay extension and marginal configuration. The first three groups (J2, J3, and J4) utilized prepared teeth for endocrowns without ferrule design and 2 mm, 3 mm, and 4 mm pulpal extensions, respectively. The second three groups (F2, F3, and F4) utilized prepared teeth with 1 mm shoulder margins and 2 mm, 3 mm, and 4 mm pulpal extensions. The endocrowns were fabricated from ZLS blocks using CAD/CAM milling technology. After cementation, the specimens underwent thermal aging for 5000 cycles and were evaluated for marginal adaptation. Using a universal testing machine, the fracture resistance was tested under quasistatic loading (1 mm/min). Two-way ANOVA and the Tukey's post hoc test were employed for data analysis (p ≤ 0.05). The results of this study revealed that endocrowns without ferrule exhibited superior fracture strength than a 1 mm ferrule design p < 0.05, irrespective of the inlay depth. All designs with and without ferrule and all inlay depths showed clinically acceptable marginal and internal fit. The conventional endocrown design without ferrule and 2 mm inlay depth showed the lowest surface gap. The pulpal surface showed the highest discrepancy among all groups compared to the other surfaces. Endocrowns without ferrule are more conservative and have higher fracture strength than 1 mm ferrule designs; extending the inlay depth showed a significant increase in fracture resistance of the 1 mm ferrule design, but not for the conventional design without ferrule and 2 mm inlay depth. All groups exhibited a high auspicious fracture strength value for molar endocrown restorations.

Practical applications of robots in prosthodontics for tooth preparation and denture tooth arrangement: A scoping review.

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: With the increasing interest in using robots in dentistry and the widespread dissemination of information on this topic and its applications, a comprehensive review of robot applications in prosthodontics is needed. PURPOSE: The purpose of this scoping review was to assess the current status of prosthodontic robotic applications, their achievements to date, and the barriers hindering their broader adoption and further advancement. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The checklist for Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) was used to conduct this review. A comprehensive search methodology was developed to identify relevant studies on the use of robots in prosthodontic procedures in the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases. The inclusion criteria were studies that specifically outlined the application of robots in the field of prosthodontics. RESULTS: Eighteen relevant studies were found. Of these, 10 studies focused on assessing the effectiveness of robotic systems through in vitro testing using phantom models for tooth preparation. These studies specifically explored the processes involved in creating complete crowns and veneers. The remaining 8 studies investigated the use of robotics in tooth alignment, with a specific focus on complete dentures. CONCLUSIONS: Robots have the potential to improve precision and accuracy in prosthetic dentistry. However, clinical studies are needed to confirm the widespread use of robots in prosthodontics, as their clinical application is still in its early stages.

Quantitative and qualitative 3D analysis of mandibular lingual concavities: Implications for dental implant planning in the posterior mandible.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to investigate the type of ridge (degree of angulation of the lingual concavity) and the buccolingual dimensions in the area of the first and second molars in both genders of different ages and how this will affect implant placement in the posterior mandible. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective cross-sectional study comprised cone beam computed tomography images of 150 dental patients (75 males and 71 aged ≥30). The following were measured/reported: type (morphology) of the ridge (convex [C], parallel [P], or undercut [U]), buccolingual width at the base and the crest of the ridge, and ridge height. The concavity angle, depth, and length of the U-shaped ridge were measured too. RESULTS: The prevalence of type U ridge ranged from 32.7% in the first molar region to 62.7% in the second molar region. Almost all measurements and ridge type distributions were comparable amongst the age groups (p > .05). Very few significant differences were found when comparing #36 versus #37 and #46 versus #47 teeth, with no differences in the distribution of the ridge types (p > .05). Quite the inverse, all measurements were statistically different when comparing #36 versus #37 and #46 versus #47 teeth, and type U ridge was more frequent in second molar compared to the first molar regions, respectively (p < .05). Many measurements were statistically higher in females; the inverse was true for a few measurements (p < .05). Type U ridge in #36 and #37 was found more frequently among males (p < .001). In contrast, the ridge types in #37 and #47 were not statistically different gender-wise. CONCLUSIONS: The U type of ridge was more prevalent in the investigated population, encountered more frequently in the second molars generally and in the first molars of males than females. Most posterior mandibular measurements are similar age- and side-wise but seem different gender- and tooth-wise.

Survival and debonding resistance of posterior cantilever resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses for moderately and severely worn dentition during thermomechanical loading.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to investigate the survival rate, the debonding resistance, and the failure modes of different occlusal veneer designs when used as a retainer for posterior cantilever, resin-bonded fixed dental prostheses (RBFDPs) at two tooth wear levels. METHODS: Four test groups were assigned: two groups with occlusal-proximal preparation (PT1 and PT2 for grade 2 and 3 wear), and two groups for occlusal-proximal and lingual preparation (PLT1 and PLT2 for grade 2 and 3 wear) Monolithic zirconia ceramic (3Y-TZP) RBFDPs were luted with an adhesive bonding system (Panavia V5). The specimens underwent a chewing simulation for 1.200.000 cycles with a load of 5 kg and thermocycling for 7500 cycles between 5 °C and 55 °C. The surviving restorations were debonded under quasi-static conditions. The results were analyzed with ANOVA. RESULTS: The specimens exhibited a 100 % survival rate after thermomechanical fatigue loading. The debonding resistance was statistically significant higher for group PLT1 than for group PT1 (P = 0.004), and higher for group PT2 than group PT1 (P ≤ 0.001). However, the debonding resistance showed no statistically significant difference between groups PT2 and PLT2 (P = 0.343), and groups PLT1 and PLT2 (P = 0.222). Groups PT1 and PT2 showed favorable failure modes in 62.5 % and 0.00 % of the specimens, respectively. While groups PLT1 and PLT2 presented 25 % favorable failure modes. SIGNIFICANCE: Occlusal veneers showed promising results as a retainer for cantilever RBFDPs. The lingual extension might increase debonding resistance. Nevertheless, conservative designs with lingual and proximal bevels are to be recommended, irrespective of the level of tooth wear.

Clinical reliability of self-adhesive luting resins compared to other adhesive procedures: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES: This systematic review aimed to collect and interpret the randomized clinical trials (RCTs) that investigated the outcome of the self-adhesive luting resins (SA) compared to total-etch (TE), selective etch with dentin adhesives (Sle), selective etch without dentin adhesives (SleSA) or self-etch adhesives (SE). DATA SOURCES: A thorough search of Internet databases was conducted without language restrictions, and the search ran up to and including April 2022. The illegible records citations were checked for more relevant clinical studies. STUDY SELECTION/RESULTS: The inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared self-adhesive luting resins with total-etch, selective-etch, or self-etch adhesives regarding postoperative sensitivity, incidences of debonding, and survival rates of indirect restorations. From 1732 records, 9 RCTs met the eligibility criteria. Three RCTs compared total-etch adhesive to self-adhesive luting resin for intracoronal restorations, one RCT compared selective etch to self-adhesive luting resin for inlays, and 5 RCTs compared self-adhesive to other protocols for partial ceramic crowns. Postoperative sensitivity showed a non-statistically significant difference between SA and other adhesive protocols, SA revealed a non-statistically significant difference in debonding and survival to TE, but a lower statistically significant difference to Sle, SleSA, and SE. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative sensitivity might not be affected by the adhesive protocol. In relatively short observation, TE revealed comparable survival to SA for intracoronal restorations. SE and Sle exhibited the best clinical outcomes, followed by SleSA. Selective etch, and self-etch adhesives are preferable to self-adhesive resins. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: The significance of enamel etching and the superiority of self-etching adhesives over self-adhesive luting resins for reliable and durable bonding and improved clinical outcomes. However, long-term RCTs, particularly for total-etch comparison to self-adhesive luting resins, might be recommended to derive further evidence.